Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TED HOPKINS LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 14 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTED HOPKINS LTD(You)BRIGGS EQUIPMENT UK LIMITEDF.R. SHARROCK LIMITEDLister WilderGlendale Countryside LtdBalmers GM Ltd
iAuto-picked from 14 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BE BRIGGS EQUIPMENT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | FS F.R. SHARROCK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | LW Lister Wilder Peer · rank #3 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #4 | BG Balmers GM Ltd Peer · rank #5 | TH TED HOPKINS LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.5m | £2.1m | £1.3m | £641k | £461k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £174k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £16.7m | £23.5m | £31.1m | £180.4m | £12.4m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —