Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Nynas stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNynas(You)EQUANS Regeneration LimitedHankinson Whittle LimitedMULTEVO LIMITEDRingway Infrastructure Services LimitedMarlborough Highways Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ER EQUANS Regeneration Limited Peer · rank #1 | HW Hankinson Whittle Limited Peer · rank #2 | MU MULTEVO LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | NY Nynas (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #5 | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £162.1m | £31.3m | £1.1m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £2.0bn | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.3bn | £54.1m | £76.9m | — | £4.8bn | £451.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 21 | 4 | 6 | — | 1 | 3 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —