Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M & A DOOCEY CIVILENGINEERING LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortM & A DOOCEY CIVILENGINEERING LIMITED(You)Kier ConstructionGalliford Try Construction LimitedTotal Energies Gas and Power LimitedRingway Infrastructure Services LimitedMarlborough Highways Limited
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | GT Galliford Try Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | TE Total Energies Gas and Power Limited Peer · rank #3 | M& M & A DOOCEY CIVILENGINEERING LIMITED (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #5 | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £189.7m | £8.8m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £2.0bn | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £1.9bn | £172.8m | £6.0m(−100%) | £4.8bn | £451.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 11 | 5 | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —