Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Kurt J Lesker Company Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortKurt J Lesker Company Limited(You)AECOM LIMITEDAmey OW LimitedWaterman Infrastructure & Environment LimitedRAMBOLL UK LIMITEDThe Decommissioning Alliance
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | AO Amey OW Limited Peer · rank #2 | WI Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited Peer · rank #3 | RU RAMBOLL UK LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | TD The Decommissioning Alliance Peer · rank #5 | KJ Kurt J Lesker Company Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.8m | £21.0m | £20.2m | £16.4m | £7.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £1.2m | £840k | £840k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £1.5bn | £129.0m | £136.9m | £50.9m | £3.0m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 144 | 43 | 25 | 20 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —