Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Jorgensen Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJorgensen Ltd(You)A Connolly LtdPilon LimitedOROSTREAM INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS LTDMatthews and TannertMulalley and Company Ltd
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AC A Connolly Ltd Peer · rank #1 | PI Pilon Limited Peer · rank #2 | OI OROSTREAM INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS LTD Peer · rank #3 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #4 | JO Jorgensen Ltd (You) · target supplier | MA Mulalley and Company Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £14.9m | £6.7m | £4.0m | £1.2m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £400k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £356.9m | £280.3m | £32.9m | £207.7m | £0.07(−100%) | £254.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 8 | 4 | 1 | 6 | — | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —