Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ON365 LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortON365 LIMITED(You)Fujitsu Services LimitedBritish Telecommunications PLCQuickline Communications LimitedFreedom Fibre LtdWessex Internet
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | FS Fujitsu Services Limited Peer · rank #1 | BT British Telecommunications PLC Peer · rank #2 | ON ON365 LIMITED (You) · target supplier | QC Quickline Communications Limited Peer · rank #4 | FF Freedom Fibre Ltd Peer · rank #5 | WI Wessex Internet Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £286.8m | £53.1m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £186k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.8bn | £2.9bn | £18k(−100%) | £311.8m | £67.2m | £99.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 7 | 32 | 1(−95%) | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —