Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Element Materials Technology Warwick Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortElement Materials Technology Warwick Ltd(You)AECOM LIMITEDFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITEDBRUKER UK LIMITEDTSQUARED P2 LIMITEDKyma S.p.A.
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BU BRUKER UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | EM Element Materials Technology Warwick Ltd (You) · target supplier | TP TSQUARED P2 LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | KS Kyma S.p.A. Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.8m | £10.5m | £3.1m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £828.9m | £247.2m | £90.9m | £232k(−100%) | £20.6m | £2.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 144 | 19 | 13 | 1(−94%) | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —