Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Marine Conservation Society stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMarine Conservation Society(You)CBRE MANAGED SERVICES LIMITEDRSK Environment LtdRicardo-AEA LtdBUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITEDGlendale Countryside Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CM CBRE MANAGED SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | RE RSK Environment Ltd Peer · rank #2 | RI Ricardo-AEA Ltd Peer · rank #3 | BD BUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #5 | MC Marine Conservation Society (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £60.9m | £5.2m | £3.0m | £672k | £641k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £25k | £185k | — | £174k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.9bn | £94.3m | £185.7m | £26.0m | £180.4m | £136k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 16 | 17 | 39 | 10 | 19 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —