Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Maudesport Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMaudesport Ltd(You)KOMPAN LtdWicksteed Leisure LtdSUTCLIFFE PLAY LIMITEDEIBEPLAY LIMITEDJupiter Play and Leisure Ltd
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KO KOMPAN Ltd Peer · rank #1 | WL Wicksteed Leisure Ltd Peer · rank #2 | SP SUTCLIFFE PLAY LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | MA Maudesport Ltd (You) · target supplier | EI EIBEPLAY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | JP Jupiter Play and Leisure Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £6.4m | £1.2m | £149k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £307k | — | £100k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £64.7m | £24.9m | £14.1m | £1.2m(−92%) | £11.5m | £10.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 40 | 26 | 7 | — | 6 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —