Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CUMBRIA WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD. stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Yorkshire.
Value band:
/
CohortCUMBRIA WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD.(You)Wates Construction LimitedMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDSuez Recycling and Recovery UK LtdRECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDSmurfit Kappa Recycling
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | WC Wates Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | SR Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | CW CUMBRIA WASTE MANAGEMENT LTD. (You) · target supplier | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £251.9m | £59.0m | £1.8m | £300k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £32.8m | £22k | £89k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £7.1bn | £1.5bn | £802.9m | £12.5m | £16.7m(−98%) | £24.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 20 | 75 | 24 | 2 | 2(−91%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —