Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CAMBRIDGE INFORMATION LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 9 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCAMBRIDGE INFORMATION LTD(You)SoftcatAECOM LIMITEDCOMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITEDPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPMOTT MACDONALD LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 9 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | C( COMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #4 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CI CAMBRIDGE INFORMATION LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £443.8m | £219.5m | £106.6m | £92.7m | £59.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | £4.8m | £7.5m | £1.2m | £22k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £827.8m | £1.4bn | £1.1bn | £1.5bn | £33.7m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 463 | 132 | 96 | 65 | 75 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —