Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Med-I-Pant (U.K.) Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMed-I-Pant (U.K.) Limited(You)MEDTRONIC LIMITEDMedequip Assistive Technology LtdStannah Lift Services LimitedBECKMAN COULTER UNITED KINGDOM LIMITEDSafequip Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ME MEDTRONIC LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MA Medequip Assistive Technology Ltd Peer · rank #2 | SL Stannah Lift Services Limited Peer · rank #3 | BC BECKMAN COULTER UNITED KINGDOM LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | SA Safequip Limited Peer · rank #5 | M( Med-I-Pant (U.K.) Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £27.5m | £8.5m | £4.5m | £941k | £278k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £327k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £460.8m | £822.4m | £145.4m | £204.9m | £2.6m | £4.4m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 30 | 6 | 18 | 7 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —