Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How The Bat Conservation Trust stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 14 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortThe Bat Conservation Trust(You)OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITEDCBRE Managed Services LimitedMITIE LIMITEDRSK Environment LtdBUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 14 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | OA OVE ARUP & PARTNERS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CM CBRE Managed Services Limited Peer · rank #2 | MI MITIE LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | RE RSK Environment Ltd Peer · rank #4 | BD BUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | TB The Bat Conservation Trust (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £79.4m | £60.3m | £5.5m | £5.2m | £672k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.9m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £536.1m | £1.7bn | £472.9m | £93.4m | £24.9m | £2.2m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 122 | 13 | 10 | 16 | 10 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —