Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Magnet Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North East.
Value band:
/
CohortMagnet Limited(You)Kier ConstructionIan WilliamsLYRECO UK LIMITEDCITY PLUMBING SUPPLIES HOLDINGS LIMITEDRingway Infrastructure Services Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | IW Ian Williams Peer · rank #2 | LU LYRECO UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | MA Magnet Limited (You) · target supplier | CP CITY PLUMBING SUPPLIES HOLDINGS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £235.4m | £5.2m | £1.3m(−99%) | £841k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £231k | — | — | — | £2.0bn |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £1.0bn | £353.7m | £65.9m(−94%) | £132.3m | £4.8bn |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 23 | 29 | 2(−91%) | 6 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —