Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How KIER METEK CONSORTIUM stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortKIER METEK CONSORTIUM(You)Kier ConstructionWates Construction LimitedDodd GroupMuse Developments LtdS J M and Co. Ltd
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | WC Wates Construction Limited Peer · rank #2 | DG Dodd Group Peer · rank #3 | KM KIER METEK CONSORTIUM (You) · target supplier | MD Muse Developments Ltd Peer · rank #5 | SJ S J M and Co. Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £250.9m | £18.1m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £32.8m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5bn | £7.1bn | £18.1m | £220.0m(−93%) | £3.0bn | £20.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 35 | 20 | 1 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —