Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TECHNOCOVER LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTECHNOCOVER LIMITED(You)C.L.C. CONTRACTORS LIMITEDSYNERGIZE LTDOPENVIEW SECURITY SOLUTIONS LIMITEDSIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITEDThales DIS UK Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CC C.L.C. CONTRACTORS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SY SYNERGIZE LTD Peer · rank #2 | OS OPENVIEW SECURITY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | TE TECHNOCOVER LIMITED (You) · target supplier | SM SIEMENS MOBILITY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | TD Thales DIS UK Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £91.3m | £32.9m | £20.5m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.0bn | £159.3m | £372.2m | — | £2.1bn | £316.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 43 | 5 | 14 | — | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —