Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ARLINGCLOSE LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 18 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: West Midlands.
Value band:
/
CohortARLINGCLOSE LIMITED(You)Sopra Steria LimitedMatrix SCM LimitedGRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLPLogiq Consulting LimitedConexia Limited
iAuto-picked from 18 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SS Sopra Steria Limited Peer · rank #1 | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #2 | GT GRANT THORNTON UK ADVISORY and TAX LLP Peer · rank #3 | LC Logiq Consulting Limited Peer · rank #4 | CO Conexia Limited Peer · rank #5 | AR ARLINGCLOSE LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £29.2m | £19.5m | £8.2m | £4.9m | £459k | £137k(−98%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £125k | £138k | — | — | £193k(+47%) |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.2bn | £1.7bn | £235.1m | £42.0m | £286.3m | £11.1m(−96%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 10 | 25 | 7 | 3 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —