Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Imosphere Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortImosphere Ltd(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCCDW UK LtdERNST & YOUNG LLPXMA LtdSoftServe Systems Ltd
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | CU CDW UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #3 | XM XMA Ltd Peer · rank #4 | SS SoftServe Systems Ltd Peer · rank #5 | IM Imosphere Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £772.8m | £216.8m | £108.5m | £52.5m | £8.6m | £228k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £62.3m | — | £963k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.5bn | £1.1bn | £1.8bn | £1.0bn | £20.7m | £2.7m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 48 | 127 | 62 | 68 | 2 | 4 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —