Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CLC UTILITY SERVICES LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortCLC UTILITY SERVICES LIMITED(You)British Telecommunications PLCMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITEDRingway Infrastructure Services LimitedQuickline Communications LimitedHitachi Rail GTS UK Limited and Telent Technology Services Limited Joint Venture
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BT British Telecommunications PLC Peer · rank #1 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CU CLC UTILITY SERVICES LIMITED (You) · target supplier | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #4 | QC Quickline Communications Limited Peer · rank #5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £54.1m | £2.0m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £186k | £121.0m | — | £2.0bn | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.9bn | £187.3m | — | £4.8bn | £311.8m | £80.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 41 | 4 | — | 1 | — | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —