Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Tannahill Reay Visual Communications Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTannahill Reay Visual Communications Limited(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCCHARTERHOUSE VOICE & DATA LIMITEDgvav ltdPacific Computers LimitedInformation Data & Network Supplies Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | CV CHARTERHOUSE VOICE & DATA LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | GV gvav ltd Peer · rank #3 | PC Pacific Computers Limited Peer · rank #4 | TR Tannahill Reay Visual Communications Limited (You) · target supplier | ID Information Data & Network Supplies Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £706.0m | £2.2m | £1.8m | £1.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £3k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £43.0m | £20.7m | £19.0m | £79k(−100%) | £63.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 10 | 11 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —