Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Giles Landscapes CMS Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGiles Landscapes CMS Limited(You)Iss Mediclean LimitedGlendale Countryside LtdPRO LANDSCAPES MDX LTDCONTINENTAL LANDSCAPES LIMITEDBILL KEAR PLANT & AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTORS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IM Iss Mediclean Limited Peer · rank #1 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #2 | PL PRO LANDSCAPES MDX LTD Peer · rank #3 | GL Giles Landscapes CMS Limited (You) · target supplier | CL CONTINENTAL LANDSCAPES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | BK BILL KEAR PLANT & AGRICULTURAL CONTRACTORS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £286.4m | £641k | £67k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £174k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.6bn | £180.4m | £20.1m | £22k(−100%) | £98.8m | £23.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 16 | 6 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —