Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How EPM Consultancy stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 18 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: East Midlands.
Value band:
/
CohortEPM Consultancy(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDBaringa Partners LLPArup/AECOMMace LimitedSSCL
iAuto-picked from 18 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | BP Baringa Partners LLP Peer · rank #2 | AR Arup/AECOM Peer · rank #3 | MA Mace Limited Peer · rank #4 | EC EPM Consultancy (You) · target supplier | SS SSCL Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £308.8m | £20.7m | £2.1m | £1.4m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | £10.7m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £166.9m | £2.6m | £5.2bn | £19k(−100%) | £159.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 55 | 22 | 1 | 7 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —