Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How WARD DIAMOND ADVERTISING LIMITED (WDAD) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Yorkshire.
Value band:
/
CohortWARD DIAMOND ADVERTISING LIMITED (WDAD)(You)Alexander Mann SolutionsCAPGEMINI UK PLCDeloitte LLPPA ConsultingAtamis Ltd
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AM Alexander Mann Solutions Peer · rank #1 | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #2 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #3 | PC PA Consulting Peer · rank #4 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #5 | WD WARD DIAMOND ADVERTISING LIMITED (WDAD) (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.9bn | £772.3m | £420.8m | £150.0m | £18.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £15.1m | £51.7m | £2.7m | — | £18.1m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £25.9bn | £4.5bn | £2.8bn | £150.0m | £73.4m | £6.7m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 44 | 46 | 92 | 1 | 11 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —