Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How AMEY OWR LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortAMEY OWR LIMITED(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDDeloitte LLPCACI LIMITEDTrustmarque Solutions LtdFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #2 | CA CACI LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | TS Trustmarque Solutions Ltd Peer · rank #4 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | AO AMEY OWR LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £516.5m | £291.9m | £47.5m | £18.0m | £10.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | £5.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £2.0bn | £158.4m | £18.0m | £247.2m | £11.4m(−95%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 95 | 29 | 2 | 19 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —