Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MORGAN MCKINLEY GROUP LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 17 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMORGAN MCKINLEY GROUP LIMITED(You)KPMG LLPTHE SUPPLY REGISTER LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Infrastructure LtdCARE COVE LIMITEDEndeavour Training
iAuto-picked from 17 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | TS THE SUPPLY REGISTER LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | T& Turner & Townsend Infrastructure Ltd Peer · rank #3 | CC CARE COVE LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | ET Endeavour Training Peer · rank #5 | MM MORGAN MCKINLEY GROUP LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £7.0m | £5.2m | £3.7m | £3.7m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £118.7m | £14.1m | £3.7m | £3.9m | £2.1m(−85%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —