Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Chicken Joes Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortChicken Joes Limited(You)Aspens Services LtdThomas Ridley Foodservice LtdSport and Leisure ManagementMELLORS CATERING SERVICES LIMITEDBFS GROUP LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AS Aspens Services Ltd Peer · rank #1 | TR Thomas Ridley Foodservice Ltd Peer · rank #2 | CJ Chicken Joes Limited (You) · target supplier | SA Sport and Leisure Management Peer · rank #4 | MC MELLORS CATERING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | BG BFS GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £25.2m | £120k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | £827.1m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £508.5m | £45.1m | £1.2m(−100%) | £379.1m | £85.9m | £894.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 18 | 1 | — | — | 3 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —