Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How The Consortium stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortThe Consortium(You)KOMPAN LtdPROLUDIC LIMITEDWicksteed Leisure LtdEIBEPLAY LIMITEDJupiter Play and Leisure Ltd
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KO KOMPAN Ltd Peer · rank #1 | PR PROLUDIC LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | WL Wicksteed Leisure Ltd Peer · rank #3 | TC The Consortium (You) · target supplier | EI EIBEPLAY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | JP Jupiter Play and Leisure Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £6.0m | £4.9m | £1.1m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £207k | £90k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £64.9m | £24.3m | £25.1m | — | £11.5m | £10.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 40 | 16 | 24 | — | 6 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —