Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PLANTLIFE INTERNATIONAL - THE WILD PLANT CONSERVATION CHARITY stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPLANTLIFE INTERNATIONAL - THE WILD PLANT CONSERVATION CHARITY(You)AECOM LIMITEDWSP UK LimitedIpsos (Market Research) LtdPeople For Research LimitedBMG RESEARCH LTD
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | WU WSP UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | I( Ipsos (Market Research) Ltd Peer · rank #3 | PF People For Research Limited Peer · rank #4 | BR BMG RESEARCH LTD Peer · rank #5 | PI PLANTLIFE INTERNATIONAL - THE WILD PLANT CONSERVATION CHARITY (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £224.0m | £91.1m | £20.8m | £7.5m | £1.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £731k | £2.6m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £828.9m | £2.1bn | £104.8m | £14.3m | £30.8m | £21k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 145 | 168 | 40 | 8 | 13 | 1(−98%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —