Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Philip Rose stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPhilip Rose(You)Tywys Technoleg ConsultingZEC CONSULTANCY LTDMEDIATE HEALTH CONSULTING LIMITEDCravencroft LtdBLACK KITE LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TT Tywys Technoleg Consulting Peer · rank #1 | ZC ZEC CONSULTANCY LTD Peer · rank #2 | MH MEDIATE HEALTH CONSULTING LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | PR Philip Rose (You) · target supplier | CR Cravencroft Ltd Peer · rank #5 | BK BLACK KITE LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £153k | £112k | £92k | £10k(−91%) | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £153k | £365k | £402k | £10k(−98%) | £4.6m | £656k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 12 | 3 | 3(0%) | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —