Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORPORATION LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortROCHESTER MIDLAND CORPORATION LIMITED(You)Pennington Choices LimitedRhodar Industrial ServicesAsbestech LtdMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITEDASPECT CONTRACTS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC Pennington Choices Limited Peer · rank #1 | RI Rhodar Industrial Services Peer · rank #2 | AS Asbestech Ltd Peer · rank #3 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AC ASPECT CONTRACTS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | RM ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORPORATION LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £28.9m | £6.5m | £2.3m | £2.0m | £4k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £32k | £32k | £32k | £121.0m | £32k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £208.6m | £42.8m | £157.9m | £187.3m | £120.0m | £107k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 25 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 6 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —