Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Batchleague Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 16 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBatchleague Limited(You)AECOM LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdCURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITEDLeica Microsystems (UK) LimitedM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 16 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | C& CURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | LM Leica Microsystems (UK) Limited Peer · rank #4 | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | BA Batchleague Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.4m | £38.4m | £7.5m | £3.3m | £2.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | — | — | £143k | £123.3m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £522.8m | £97.3m | £54.7m | £125.7m | £79k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 142 | 30 | 17 | 17 | 8 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —