Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How AINSCOUGH CRANE HIRE LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortAINSCOUGH CRANE HIRE LTD(You)Lister WilderGlendale Countryside LtdMarlborough Highways LimitedM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITEDKAEFER LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | LW Lister Wilder Peer · rank #1 | GC Glendale Countryside Ltd Peer · rank #2 | AC AINSCOUGH CRANE HIRE LTD (You) · target supplier | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #4 | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | KA KAEFER LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.4m | £641k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £174k | — | — | £123.3m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £31.2m | £180.4m | £4.5m(−98%) | £451.1m | £123.3m | £194.8m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 19 | — | 3 | 7 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —