Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How RIVINGTONHARK LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRIVINGTONHARK LIMITED(You)MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdMatrix SCM LimitedALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LIMITEDPellings LLP
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #3 | AL ALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #5 | RI RIVINGTONHARK LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £59.1m | £41.7m | £19.5m | £14.7m | £1.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £22k | — | £125k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £522.0m | £1.7bn | £90.5m | £148.4m | £1.9m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 83 | 23 | 10 | 11 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —