Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How W Hughes & Son Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: North West.
Value band:
/
CohortW Hughes & Son Ltd(You)Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure LtdBowmer + Kirkland LimitedBAM Construction LtdTilbury DouglasWates Construction Limited
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MS Morgan Sindall Construction & Infrastructure Ltd Peer · rank #1 | B+ Bowmer + Kirkland Limited Peer · rank #2 | BC BAM Construction Ltd Peer · rank #3 | TD Tilbury Douglas Peer · rank #4 | WC Wates Construction Limited Peer · rank #5 | WH W Hughes & Son Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £5.0bn | £554.5m | £408.3m | £318.6m | £250.4m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £32.8m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £14.2bn | £4.3bn | £2.6bn | £770.9m | £7.1bn | £1.1m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 36 | 16 | 26 | 19 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —