Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How BLACK MARBLE LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBLACK MARBLE LIMITED(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatMicrosoft LimitedCrayon LimitedFrequentis (UK) Limited
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | MI Microsoft Limited Peer · rank #3 | CR Crayon Limited Peer · rank #4 | BM BLACK MARBLE LIMITED (You) · target supplier | F( Frequentis (UK) Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £507.7m | £474.9m | £13.8m | £602k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £703k | £105.5m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.2bn | £1.5bn | £466.7m | £141.5m | £545k(−100%) | £32.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 492 | 35 | 1 | 1(−97%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —