Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Race on the Agenda stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRace on the Agenda(You)Ipsos (Market Research) LtdYonder Consulting LimitedIpsos MoriIFFAbsolute Care Services
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | I( Ipsos (Market Research) Ltd Peer · rank #1 | YC Yonder Consulting Limited Peer · rank #2 | IM Ipsos Mori Peer · rank #3 | IF IFF Peer · rank #4 | RO Race on the Agenda (You) · target supplier | AC Absolute Care Services Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £14.8m | £5.9m | £4.2m | £2.5m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £600k | — | £4.0m | £3.6m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £96.7m | £24.2m | £137.2m | £76.1m | £19k(−100%) | £40.4m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 36 | 8 | 6 | 24 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —