Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How AWW (Atkins, Walters & Webster Ltd) stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South West.
Value band:
/
CohortAWW (Atkins, Walters & Webster Ltd)(You)Jacobs UK LtdTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdJones Lang LaSalle LimitedArcadis LLPRedesmere Limited
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | JL Jones Lang LaSalle Limited Peer · rank #3 | AR Arcadis LLP Peer · rank #4 | A( AWW (Atkins, Walters & Webster Ltd) (You) · target supplier | RE Redesmere Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £48.0m | £44.3m | £7.7m | £6.6m | £1.4m(−81%) | £832k |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £264k | — | £56k | £53k | — | £5.8m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.4bn | £521.8m | £103.0m | £469.0m | £1.9m(−100%) | £32.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 80 | 23 | 21 | 15 | 1(−95%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —