Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CSH ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCSH ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED(You)RECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDN&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITEDH W MartinSmurfit Kappa RecyclingFCC Environment (UK) Limited
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | NC N&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | CE CSH ENVIRONMENTAL LIMITED (You) · target supplier | HW H W Martin Peer · rank #4 | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #5 | FE FCC Environment (UK) Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £300k | £0.03 | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.5m | £11.3m | £109k(−99%) | £15.2m | £24.4m | £407.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 4 | 1(−50%) | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —