Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How B& M Installations Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortB& M Installations Ltd(You)Kier ConstructionBAM Building and InfrastructureCURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITEDAndrew Johnson Construction LtdCompass Developments (NE) Limited
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | BB BAM Building and Infrastructure Peer · rank #2 | C& CURRIE & BROWN UK LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AJ Andrew Johnson Construction Ltd Peer · rank #4 | CD Compass Developments (NE) Limited Peer · rank #5 | BM B& M Installations Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £55.0m | £7.1m | £6.8m | £663k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £2.5m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £77.1m | £94.6m | £6.8m | £72.2m | £2.0m(−97%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 36 | 1 | 16 | 2 | 3 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —