Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How MICROPORTS.NET LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMICROPORTS.NET LIMITED(You)SoftcatTAG EUROPE LIMITEDUnit4 Business Software LimitedClue Computing Company LimitedRESTORE DIGITAL LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | TE TAG EUROPE LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | UB Unit4 Business Software Limited Peer · rank #3 | CC Clue Computing Company Limited Peer · rank #4 | MI MICROPORTS.NET LIMITED (You) · target supplier | RD RESTORE DIGITAL LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £474.9m | £8.9m | £3.6m | £2.3m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £105.5m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £16.9m | £53.0m | £10.2m | £61k(−100%) | £257.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 492 | 8 | 13 | 6 | 1(−90%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —