Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How HYDRO CLEANSING LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 14 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortHYDRO CLEANSING LIMITED(You)BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITEDWater Plus LimitedDODD GROUP (MIDLANDS) LIMITEDMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITEDEco-Waters Ltd
iAuto-picked from 14 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BW BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | WP Water Plus Limited Peer · rank #2 | DG DODD GROUP (MIDLANDS) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | HC HYDRO CLEANSING LIMITED (You) · target supplier | EC Eco-Waters Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £202.7m | £19.4m | £10.2m | £2.0m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.2m | £1.8m | — | £121.0m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £223.3m | £5.0bn | £187.3m | — | £250.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 33 | 14 | 9 | 4 | 2(−83%) | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —