Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CCL (North) Ltd. stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCCL (North) Ltd.(You)Sharpsmart LimitedIndaver Rivenhall LimitedFFC Waste Services (UK) LimitedSRCL LIMITED T/A STERICYCLEN&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SH Sharpsmart Limited Peer · rank #1 | C( CCL (North) Ltd. (You) · target supplier | IR Indaver Rivenhall Limited Peer · rank #3 | FW FFC Waste Services (UK) Limited Peer · rank #4 | SL SRCL LIMITED T/A STERICYCLE Peer · rank #5 | NC N&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.1m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £122.7m | — | £1.1bn | £510.0m | £52.7m | £11.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | — | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —