Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How K.M.R. Skip Hire Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortK.M.R. Skip Hire Limited(You)BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITEDIPL Plastics (UK) Ltd T/A IPL HullContenur UK LtdIndaver Rivenhall LimitedFFC Waste Services (UK) Limited
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BW BIFFA WASTE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | IP IPL Plastics (UK) Ltd T/A IPL Hull Peer · rank #2 | CU Contenur UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | KS K.M.R. Skip Hire Limited (You) · target supplier | IR Indaver Rivenhall Limited Peer · rank #5 | FW FFC Waste Services (UK) Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £202.7m | £7.5m | £2.9m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £107k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £87.1m | £72.2m | £1.1m(−100%) | £1.1bn | £510.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 30 | 20 | 12 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —