Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Marketing at the Mill Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMarketing at the Mill Ltd(You)Allied Publicity Services (Manchester) LtdAPS GroupAPS GROUP GLOBAL LIMITEDCFH Documail LtdCritiqom Limited trading as Adare SEC Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AP Allied Publicity Services (Manchester) Ltd Peer · rank #1 | AG APS Group Peer · rank #2 | MA Marketing at the Mill Ltd (You) · target supplier | AG APS GROUP GLOBAL LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | CD CFH Documail Ltd Peer · rank #5 | CL Critiqom Limited trading as Adare SEC Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.1m | £750k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £455.9m | £36.1m | £2.2m(−94%) | £56.2m | £5.3m | £3.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | 2 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —