Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Monoworld stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMonoworld(You)Suez Recycling and Recovery UK LtdRECONOMY (UK) LIMITEDSmurfit Kappa RecyclingJust Ask ServicesKenny Waste Management Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SR Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd Peer · rank #1 | R( RECONOMY (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | MO Monoworld (You) · target supplier | SK Smurfit Kappa Recycling Peer · rank #4 | JA Just Ask Services Peer · rank #5 | KW Kenny Waste Management Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £1.8m | £300k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £89k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £802.9m | £12.5m | £271k(−98%) | £24.4m | £2.6m | £4.0m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 24 | 2 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —