Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NATS (Services) Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNATS (Services) Ltd(You)AECOM LIMITEDJACOBS U.K. LIMITEDFRONTIER ECONOMICS LIMITEDMORGAN LAMBERT LIMITEDDigi2al Ltd
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | JU JACOBS U.K. LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | FE FRONTIER ECONOMICS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | ML MORGAN LAMBERT LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | DI Digi2al Ltd Peer · rank #5 | N( NATS (Services) Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £221.1m | £28.0m | £2.9m | £2.5m | £420k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £767k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £826.6m | £546.2m | £37.7m | £151.1m | £175.0m | £168k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 139 | 33 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —