Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CK FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortCK FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LTD(You)Iss Mediclean LimitedOCS Group UK LimitedEMCOR GROUP (UK) PLCCBRE MANAGED SERVICES LIMITEDACUMEN WASTE SERVICES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IM Iss Mediclean Limited Peer · rank #1 | OG OCS Group UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | EG EMCOR GROUP (UK) PLC Peer · rank #3 | CM CBRE MANAGED SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AW ACUMEN WASTE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CF CK FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £286.4m | £230.5m | £77.5m | £60.9m | £7.6m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.6bn | £1.1bn | £615.0m | £2.9bn | £56.8m | £3.4m(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | 14 | 1 | 16 | 6 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —