Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How UTS Engineering Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUTS Engineering Limited(You)EQUANS Regeneration LimitedHankinson Whittle LimitedM&J Group (Construction & Roofing) LtdHERTS HERITAGE BUILDING AND ROOFING LIMITEDMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ER EQUANS Regeneration Limited Peer · rank #1 | HW Hankinson Whittle Limited Peer · rank #2 | MG M&J Group (Construction & Roofing) Ltd Peer · rank #3 | HH HERTS HERITAGE BUILDING AND ROOFING LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | UE UTS Engineering Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £192.2m | £50.3m | £33.4m | £29.4m | £2.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £214.4m | — | £121.0m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.3bn | £54.1m | £741.5m | £35.9m | £187.3m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 19 | 5 | 13 | 4 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —