Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NOMOW LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNOMOW LIMITED(You)KOMPAN LtdPROLUDIC LIMITEDHAGS-SMP LIMITEDWicksteed Leisure LtdTriton Construction Limited
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KO KOMPAN Ltd Peer · rank #1 | PR PROLUDIC LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | HA HAGS-SMP LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | WL Wicksteed Leisure Ltd Peer · rank #4 | NO NOMOW LIMITED (You) · target supplier | TC Triton Construction Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £6.1m | £4.9m | £1.4m | £1.2m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £390k | £312k | £215k | £83k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £64.1m | £24.3m | £31.0m | £24.9m | £45k(−100%) | £8.7m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 18 | 32 | 26 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —