Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Compact Orbital Gears ltd. stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCompact Orbital Gears ltd.(You)Lindum Group LimitedFleet Factors LtdGSF Car Parts LimitedJHM Butt & CoBrush Technology Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | LG Lindum Group Limited Peer · rank #1 | FF Fleet Factors Ltd Peer · rank #2 | GC GSF Car Parts Limited Peer · rank #3 | JB JHM Butt & Co Peer · rank #4 | CO Compact Orbital Gears ltd. (You) · target supplier | BT Brush Technology Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £21.6m | £11.1m | £300k | £264k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £6.5m | £93k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £399.2m | £145.7m | £7.6m | £9.3m | £91k(−99%) | £9.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 43 | 12 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —